In M. Ed Master course I am
studying, I am taking Knowledge Management (KM) as for elective course. I did
choose that course as I do have a strong interest on that topic and I believe
that KM will be one of the useful tools for my career path. In the course, it
is focused on the KM in organization however, in my opinion, KM happens in
individual and other groups in different situations. Among the success stories
of KM I have read, I found one case study interesting for me as it was about
why KM fails in one of the successful company in Hong Kong. That case study
came up as the evaluation for 2 years long planned KM activities. In the case
study, it was mentioned the company followed the important steps of implementing
KM activities and needs assessment in the company. However, after two years
later, it came out like unexpected unsuccessful results and outcomes. I was
wondering even though the company applied successful KM activities and analysis
with middle-up-down approach recommended by Nonaka, KM was failed to sustain
successfully in the company.
Nevertheless, in that case study,
the authors analyzed eight driving factors which contributed the failure of KM
in the company.
(1) The top management was too
ambitious or unrealistic to grasp and incorporate the best knowledge in
industry into the company and their insufficient role support in encouraging
the desired behavior.
(2) The mere presence of KM
vision is not sufficient to guarantee KM success.
(3) There was no specific and appropriate
guidelines for knowledge sharing activities had been devised.
(4) The instruments used to help
acquire and stimulate knowledge creation and sharing encountered problems
during implementation.
(5) Although a reward system was
established for knowledge creation and sharing, the emphasis on extrinsic
terms, such as monetary bonus, turned out to have an opposite and negative
effect on cultivating the knowledge-sharing culture and trust among employees.
(6) There was a misleading notion
that IT could be the cutting-edge solution to inspire KM in organization.
(7) It was noted that the KM
initiative were left unattended once implemented.
(8) An undue emphasis and concern
with the best practice knowledge at the company to improve short-term benefits
at the expense of long-term goals.
As I learned from that case study
is that adaptation is needed in any organization even though successful KM
tools recommended by famous scholars are
applied, it is far way to be successful without adaptation which in line with
the nature and culture of the company or the organization.
No comments:
Post a Comment